Trading overview.
A transparent view of your $100 paper trading account.
Account performance
Observed equity, including open-position P&L
Simulator targets
Measured from observed paper-account history.
Collecting a full 30 days of observations
Published local drawdown scale · refreshes every 30 minutes.
Net P&L of the separate $100 simulated copier.
Full observation periods required.
Dynamic trading universe
Screening crypto candidates…
Selection requires liquidity, tight spreads, suitable volatility and sufficient price history.
Selection filters and screening results +
The engine selects up to 12 pairs from an explicit crypto-only candidate list. Minimum 24-hour quote volume: 10 million USDT; maximum spread: 0.10%; at least 168 consecutive closed hourly candles; ATR volatility: 0.2–3%. Qualifying pairs are ranked by volume. Scaled contracts for the same asset are deduplicated. Available slots stay empty if too few candidates qualify.
Selection refreshes hourly. If discovery is unavailable for more than two hours, new entries pause. All open positions remain subject to the original risk controls. A larger watchlist does not increase the $100 account balance, per-position budget, or 50% aggregate exposure ceiling.
| Pair | Screen | 24h volume USDT | Spread | ATR / price | Reason |
|---|
Research & evidence
Separate experiment accounts · original $100 account untouched
Preparing execution-aligned experiments. No candidate is approved.
| Forward account | Equity / USDT | Copier net P&L | Drawdown | Closed trades |
|---|
Historical outcomes are not forward performance.
Six historical 30-day windows +
A single preregistered logistic trade filter is trained on earlier closed baseline trades after fees and funding. Each test follows a 60-day training window and a 24-hour outcome embargo. No parameter search is performed. Historical markets are BTC, ETH and SOL; this is not validation of the expanded universe. Hourly candles require approximate intrabar stops and synthetic spreads. Forward accounts instead replay recorded observed quotes through the production execution engine.
| Window begins | Baseline P&L | Learned P&L | Stressed P&L | Learned copier P&L | All targets |
|---|
Qualification checks & limitations +
Frozen candidates run alongside a frozen breakout benchmark, cash, an increased-cost arm, and a global-risk-filter ablation. Features, weights, data and source code are fingerprinted. At least 30 forward days, sufficient closed trades, fresh uninterrupted observations, positive stressed returns, baseline improvement, a positive paired block-bootstrap lower bound, and all three account targets are required for review. No automatic live promotion is enabled. Research drawdown halts remain latched.
This model learns a trade rejection rule. It does not invent strategies, prove causal explanations for losses, or perform autonomous global research. Global feeds currently supply a separately measured risk-filter experiment, not learned global predictions. Probability scores are uncalibrated model outputs. Failed experiments remain visible.
Execution accuracy audit
Same strategies and 30-day window · hourly versus minute observations
Audit status is loading.
| Strategy | Hourly P&L | Minute P&L | Difference / USDT | Minute copier P&L | Different exit labels |
|---|
Daily context learning
Prospective payoff forecasts · price-only versus global context · no portfolio promotion
Waiting for learning-track status.
Historical minute prices still require synthetic spreads and cannot reproduce actual book depth or latency. This audit measures testing sensitivity; it does not qualify any strategy for production.
Payoff-aware learning · experiment 02
Learn the size of wins and losses · recorded execution outcomes
Exploratory experiment running. Original account and first trial remain unchanged.
| Separate forward account | Equity / USDT | Copier net P&L | Drawdown | Closed trades |
|---|
Only completed trades with their original entry context become learning examples.
Exploratory historical results — previously inspected data +
This hypothesis replaces binary win prediction with regularized regression of net realized payoff per unit of initial risk. It learns from separate breakout, pullback and mean-reversion accounts, including their actual exits, fees and funding. Twenty-four five-day block-resampled fits estimate prediction sensitivity; this is not a calibrated confidence interval. An entry needs a positive lower payoff estimate. Portfolio risk limits remain unchanged.
These six test windows reuse the first experiment's dataset. Results are exploratory and cannot establish an independent discovery. No result replaces the first report. Model parameters are fixed before the run; open trades and outcomes crossing the training cutoff are excluded.
| Window begins | Breakout P&L | Learned P&L | Stressed P&L | Learned copier P&L | All targets |
|---|
Forward experience & qualification +
The three entry-policy accounts continue collecting executed outcomes even when the learned account rejects an entry. Each closed outcome retains its original global-data context and is withheld from the learning export for 24 hours. This prepares later evidence-based experiments; the current model remains frozen during its 30-day trial. The global-filter comparison tests existing risk throttles, not a trained global forecasting model.
All experiment accounts are separate from the original $100 account. The worker cannot write production balances or promote itself. Positive retrospective results alone never authorize a switch. Full forward observations, adequate trading evidence, baseline and stressed-cost comparisons, fixed drawdown controls, and all three targets remain required.
Market context & trade reviews
Frozen breakout incumbent · risk throttles retained · candidates remain in research
Collecting observations. No learned performance is claimed yet.
Current decisions
Closed-trade reviews
Legacy forecast diagnostics — cannot promote strategies +
The three existing six-hour forecasts remain recorded for inspection. Their returns do not reproduce account execution, so these scores can no longer promote a strategy into the live paper account. Execution-aligned research is shown separately above.
Repeated realized losses and observed world indicators can still reduce the incumbent's exposure under the unchanged risk limits. These are fixed heuristics, not evidence of a trained predictive advantage.
Position mechanics 0
Every open leader position, with its sizing, thesis and exit framework
Full notional is reserved; the simulator never borrows.
Margin used = quantity × entry price, plus fees charged separately.
Neither exchange Isolated Margin nor Cross Margin; every position is fully reserved.
No liquidation price. Stops and account risk breakers request exits instead.
| Market | Thesis | Direction | Leverage | Margin used / USDT | Quantity | Open (local) | Close | Duration | Trailing SL | TP | Current | Unrealized P&L |
|---|
Closed position history
Recorded leader fills · actual open and close times · latest 12 shown
| Market | Thesis | Direction | Leverage | Margin used / USDT | Quantity | Open (local) | Close (local) | Duration | Historical SL | TP | Entry → Exit | Exit trigger |
|---|
Stop loss begins at 2× ATR and trails favorable movement. There is no fixed TP: breakout and trend positions exit on reversal, trailing stop or the five-day limit; range-reversion positions can exit at the recorded mean. Minute polling, gaps and modeled slippage mean the fill can differ from the displayed stop.
Trade journal
Persisted fills · fees included
| Time (local) | Market / action | Fill price | Fee | Cash P&L |
|---|
Engine activity
Decisions and operational health
Adaptive strategies. Fixed risk limits.
Regime-aware strategy selection · loss reviews · global context · ATR-based sizing
Risk to the initial stop, with a cost allowance. Learning can reduce this budget; gaps can exceed it.
Requests position closure and pauses entries until the next UTC day.
Requests closure and latches a halt for operator review. Learning cannot bypass it.
Leader slippage per fill plus 5 bps fees. Copier slippage: 10 bps. Modeled funding: 1 bp every 8 hours.
How performance and risk are measured +
This is an independent simulator. BingX supplies public price quotes and candles only. Balances, execution, risk ratings, copier accounts, and target evaluation belong to this simulator. The separate reference copier starts with 100 virtual USDT and follows future entries proportionally. Its capital is not added to the leader account.
Equity is wallet balance plus open-position P&L at the exit side of the quote. Opening and closing fees and modeled funding affect the wallet. Funding is 0.01% of notional every eight hours (long pays short), valued at the boundary candle open and posted after that candle closes. Estimated future closing fees are not deducted from equity. Copier earnings are its own rolling equity change after costs.
The simulator maps observed peak-to-trough drawdown to levels 1–9 at thresholds of 1%, 2%, 3%, 5%, 8%, 12%, 20%, and 30%. This is a published local scale, not a rating provided by an exchange. Both 7D and 30D windows refresh every 30 minutes. Daily return volatility is recorded separately. The adaptive system cannot change this scoring scale or fabricate account history.
Signals use closed hourly candles. Stops are checked approximately every minute at available quotes; outages and price gaps can cause larger losses. Targets require complete observation periods, fresh data, and no observation gap over five minutes in the relevant window. All results are paper results. Strategy adaptation does not guarantee positive returns.
Download full equity observations ↗